Through the Lens Essay

Does a Picture Really Tell A Thousand Words? correspond to John Berger, photographs from August 6th, 1945, are im eons of hell. (316) That was the day the US dropped an atomic miscarry on Japan, killing countless innocent civilians and severely burning others. In his essay, Hiroshima, Berger faces the idea that our culture has aban forefathered the concept of evil. (320) Countless pictures gibem to be the only thing left of that day, and from Bergers perspective, the true meaning of that feature has been hidden, change surface though the facts are still in textbooks.The concept of unconscionable pictures being taken plays an important role in Bergers thoughts just ab divulge Hiroshima, because those pictures are what initially sparked his interest. However, the idea of sharing of graphing pictures is called into question by Susan Sontag in her essay, Regarding the Pain of Others, who points out that state of war picture taking should fuck off some work on of censorship because of the effect it may withdraw on victims or families who give up lost their loved ones. While Berger doesnt seem to promote graphic picture taking, it seems that from is point of view, pictures such as these make a reality of what differently expertness just become a nonher page in our invoice books. These paintings by survivors were headn on Japanese television. Is it conceivable that the BBC would show these pictures on Channel cardinal at a peak hour? (319) He makes a cockeyed point that American television would never show those pictures without reference to semipolitical and military realities (319) because it was our country that caused such destruction. Sontag al to the highest degree reinforces this idea by say that the camera brings the viewer close, too close, (259) but at the ame time contradicts it by implying that war pictures sometimes provide inaccurate information because of new age technology. Cameras and computers today have the ability to enha nce the main focus, what the photographer wants you to examine at, and blur out other details which may change a picture completely. The real thing may not be frightening enough, and therefore needs to be enhanced or reenacted more(prenominal) convincingly. (259) This brings out a good point, although cameras used in 1945 wouldnt have that benign of technology, but they can still be edited today.That being said, a picture can be inaccurate in more slipway than one. While the Hiroshima pictures are heartbreaking to tactile sensation at, Berger fails to address the fact that not all war pictures tell the full story, along with what may have happened before and after the picture was taken, and some may be taken completely out of context. Sontag brings in this idea by talking more or less a famous picture of a South Vietnamese everyday shooting a Vietcong suspect, which turned out to be staged. This idea calls Bergers argument into question, because it is unknown which pictures are real and which are mainly for ublicity purposes. We dont know what happened before, after, or even whats red ink on outside the frame on a picture just by looking at it. Only the photographer and the great deal present at that moment know the whole truth. Although Sontag brings in some point that were lost(p) by Berger, Sontag reinforces Bergers speculation that US television and newspapers only show what the government wants the public to see, and nothing more. She adds that the military promoted images that illustrated Americas supreme military superiority over its enemy. (260) in the Gulf War in 1991.This idea really brings the true motives of our nation out, which is really what Bergers total argument is based off of. He tries to make the US look like bullies, killing innocent people to scare their government so that we look like a strong country that defeats the bad guys and protects its citizens. It was not a miscalculation, an error, or the result of a situation de teriorating so promptly that it gets out of hand. (319) This quote proves that, from Bergers perspective, the US purposely caused such an event, which was preplanned , not a defense mechanism.While Sontag doesnt specify an opinion approximately wherefore the US only shows pictures that make ourgovernment look good, she does mention that the use of cameras at the front for nonmilitary purposes have become much stricter as war has become an activity prosecuted with increasingly exact optical devices for tracking the enemy. (260) This would apologise why we dont see many pictures of the war going on right now, even though its been going on for many years already. Berger aims his focus on Hiroshima alone, while Sontag looks at the fully grown picture of war photography in itself.Sontag would assumingly agree with Berger about the make love of Hiroshima, how horrifying it was and how those pictures play such a big role. At the same(p) time, I think this would further promote her idea that war photography is sometimes too harsh, even though without comprehend those pictures, one might not be able to imagine such horror. However, Sontag might not agree with Berger when he says the memory of these events should be continually before our eyes. (320) A lot of pictures should be continually before our eyes, and unfortunately Hiroshima is only an eccentric of events hat would be forgotten without visual aids to remind us. He himself is an example, not interested in the book on his desk until he heart-to-heart it and was reminded of such an event. But like Sontag says, to display the dead, after all, is what the enemy does. (259) In many third world countries, people see death and malady all the time. Civilians in places like Iraq and Afghanistan plausibly see death more than anyone, and we, the enemy, are the ones showing it to them. For us, war pictures hit too close to home, peculiarly for amilies that have loved ones overseas fighting for our country, b ut what about people that have to witness it firsthand? They dont always have a choice. Berger, who is British, calls his friend from America, the one he talks about in the beginning, innocent, saying that she looks at a nuclear holocaust without considering its reality. (321) But in a way, many Americans do that. We could google many kinds of pictures, graphic or not, whenever we see like it, but do we really think about what it would be like to be there?This is the problem with Sontags idea about war photos not being shown without them, many Americans would probably be even more naive than they already are. If I told you a bomb was dropped on Japan and many people were killed and burned, you would probably feel sympathy, but you would probably go on with your day, as would a lot of people. But seeing pictures, children burned, dead bodies, that would make it more real, and thats why Berger says we should constantly see things like that. Unfortunately, that cant be publicly shown , especially on television, where verything has to be family oriented. Theres a downside to both arguments we cant constantly be reminded of such horrible things like Hiroshima, but we overly cant be completely out of the loop. War photography is a controversial topic, but its one that will most likely always be part of life. As long as theres wars, there will be people difficult to expose the events and realities of it. Works Cited Berger, John Hiroshima palm of Reading, 2010, Bedford/ St. Martins Sontag, Susan Regarding the Pain of Others Fields of Reading, 2010, Bedford/ St. Martins