Napster - Stare And Live The Nightmare :: essays research papers

For many years the record companies beat fixed record footings to ward off competing with each other and to maximize their profits. Currently, the record companies are collaborating in rate to force Napster to shut down. The record companies are claiming that Napster is breaking copyright laws. Napster is a peace of software available for free on the Internet, which allows you to download just about any song you can think of. All you need to appropriate Napster is a computer and Internet connection, the faster the better. Should people feel kind-heartedness for the record companies because of the supposed starvation as a result of Napster charge sharing? Or should the sympathy lie with the users of Napster? Let us take care who is trying to shut down Napster and for what reasons. Let us also notice the reasons why people want Napster to remain open. The accede Company is powerfully opposed to Napster for one reason and one reason only. Apparently, the record companies a re losing more and more of the market to Napster file sharing on the Internet. Record companies justify their lawsuits once against Napster with the line so often used in advocate conferences, Napster breaks copyright laws. This phrase seems like a legitimate argument. One could date the reasons for feeling this way. For simplicity sake, we will use Dave as an example. Dave developed a product and sells it, and, at first, his product does very well. His product is then duplicated again and again by a person who purchased his product. Dave watches his sales plummet and, of course, feels cheated. Should Dave have the right to sue the person who copied his product? Most people would severalize yes. This is the argument the record companies are making in defense of the lawsuits against Napster. However, let us look deeper into the matters of sales within the record companies. Record companies reckon they are suffering as a result of Napster. The price of a CD has stayed the same fo r many years as far as I can remember. Why would the record companies not raise the price of a CD if their profits were dropping? Also, the sales of records from1999 to 2000 have real increased 2%. Why would there be an increase in sales if, the record companies claim, Napster is hurting their business and taking up or so of the market? I am sure if Napster was good for business in the record companies eyes, the record companies would not be complaining about copyright infringement laws being broken.